Impression Share Benchmarks 2026

Average Google Ads impression share is 37% cross-industry. Top performers hold 65%+. Most IS loss splits roughly 28% to budget and 35% to rank - each requiring a different fix. Get started free By Benchmarketing Research Team Reviewed by Performance Marketing Editorial Reviewed March 2026 · observations Q1 2023 – Q4 2024

Google Ads impression share - Cross-industry medians-2026

37.0%

Avg Impression Share, cross-industry median

IS Lost to Budget
28.0%
IS Lost to Rank
35.0%
Elite Threshold
65%+

What Is Impression Share and Why Does It Matter?

Impression share (IS) is the percentage of eligible auctions where your ad was shown. If your campaign was eligible to appear 1,000 times and showed 370 times, your IS is 37%. Lost IS breaks into two buckets: lost to budget (ad stopped showing because daily budget ran out) and lost to rank (ad was outbid or had insufficient Quality Score).

Quick Answer

A good impression share for non-brand Search campaigns is 40 - 60%. For branded keywords, aim for 90%+. For Shopping campaigns, 30 - 50% is typical in competitive categories. IS above 65% indicates strong account health - you are winning more auctions than you lose. Higher IS = better, indicating stronger share of available auctions being won.

Impression share is most actionable when split by brand vs. non-brand campaigns. Branded IS below 90% is a red flag - competitors are bidding on your name and winning. Non-brand IS below 20% usually signals budget is too restricted for the keyword set, or Quality Scores need significant improvement.

Impression Share by Industry

SegmentMedian ISBottom QuartileTop Quartile
Home Services 41% 24%62%
Legal 44% 26%65%
Education 42% 25%63%
Automotive 39% 22%61%
Healthcare 38% 22%58%
Financial Services 35% 20%56%
Real Estate 33% 19%54%
Ecommerce 31% 18%52%
SaaS 29% 16%48%
B2B Services 27% 14%45%

Higher IS = better - indicates stronger share of available auctions being won. Legal and Home Services see higher IS partly because local advertisers dominate specific geographic auctions with smaller eligible impression pools.

IS Lost to Budget vs. Lost to Rank (by Campaign Type)

SegmentCampaign TypeLost to Budget (avg)Lost to Rank (avg)
Search (Brand) - IS Lost Budget: 15%IS Lost Rank: 20%
Search (Non-Brand) - IS Lost Budget: 32%IS Lost Rank: 38%
Shopping - IS Lost Budget: 41%IS Lost Rank: 31%
Display - IS Lost Budget: 22%IS Lost Rank: 45%

Shopping campaigns lose more IS to budget than rank - budgets are often under-allocated relative to demand. Display campaigns lose most IS to rank - Quality Score and bid floor issues dominate.

How to Increase Impression Share

1

Increase budget for high IS-lost-to-budget campaigns

If IS Lost to Budget exceeds 20% on a profitable campaign, increasing daily budget is the highest-ROI action available. You are already winning auctions - you just run out of money before the day ends. Calculate expected CPA at increased spend before scaling.

2

Improve Quality Score to win more auctions

IS Lost to Rank is driven by Ad Rank - a function of bid and Quality Score. Improving Quality Score (expected CTR, ad relevance, landing page experience) raises Ad Rank without increasing bids. Moving from QS 5 to QS 8 can dramatically improve IS Lost to Rank at the same budget.

3

Narrow match types to win higher share in key queries

Broad match campaigns spread budget across thousands of queries, winning low IS in many. Phrase and exact match focus budget on high-intent queries where you can achieve dominant IS (60%+). For your most valuable queries, exact match + high bids is the fastest path to 80%+ IS.

4

Use IS targets in Smart Bidding strategies

Google's Target Impression Share bidding strategy automates bid adjustments to hit a specific IS target. Use it for brand campaigns (target 90 - 95% IS) and for must-win non-brand keywords where competitive defense is critical.

5

Analyze IS by device and adjust bids accordingly

IS often varies significantly by device. If mobile IS is high but desktop IS is low, your desktop bids are under-competitive. Use device bid adjustments to allocate budget to the devices where you are most profitable and increase IS strategically.

Frequently Asked Questions

For non-brand Search campaigns, a good IS is 40 - 60%. For branded keywords, 90%+ is the target - anything less means competitors are winning auctions on your brand name. For Shopping campaigns, 30 - 50% is typical in competitive categories. IS above 65% in any non-brand campaign is excellent and indicates strong auction competitiveness. Do not chase 100% IS on non-brand terms - the marginal cost of the last 10 - 20% of IS is rarely economical.

Sources

Every statistic on this page traces to a named source below. Benchmarketing does not publish anonymous "studies show" figures. Rows labeled Benchmarketing are our own aggregated, curated benchmark data.

  1. 1 WordStream Google Ads Benchmarks, 2024. Third-party research
  2. 2 Meta Business Insights, 2024. Platform data
  3. 3 HubSpot Email Marketing Report, 2024. Third-party research
  4. 4 Unbounce Conversion Benchmark Report, 2024. Third-party research
  5. 5 Databox Marketing Benchmark Report, 2024. Third-party research
  6. 6 AdLiftr Snapchat Ads Cost Benchmarks, 2026. Third-party research
  7. 7 Ad Badger Amazon Advertising Benchmarks, 2026. Third-party research
Cite this page Email me when these benchmarks change

No account needed. At most one email a week, only when something moves.

See how your performance compares

Import a campaign export and see each metric placed against the benchmark for your industry and channel.

Get started free

Invite-only right now · 14-day free trial when you join

Where do you rank?

Enter your Impression Share (Non-Brand) to see your percentile position.

% 22% P25 42% Med 65% P75 85% Elite

Enter your Impression Share (Non-Brand) above

These benchmarks are drawn from a multi-source benchmark cohort aggregated across industries and regions, covering the period Q1 2023 – Q4 2024. Figures on this page come from the Benchmarketing benchmark dataset: thousands of curated benchmark observations spanning channels, industries, and US metro areas, refreshed on a published schedule. Every statistic traces to a named source — no anonymous “studies show.” Data is sourced from:

  • WordStream Google Ads Benchmarks (2024) - Third-party research
  • Meta Business Insights (2024) - Platform data
  • HubSpot Email Marketing Report (2024) - Third-party research
  • Unbounce Conversion Benchmark Report (2024) - Third-party research
  • Databox Marketing Benchmark Report (2024) - Third-party research
  • AdLiftr Snapchat Ads Cost Benchmarks (2026) - Third-party research
  • Ad Badger Amazon Advertising Benchmarks (2026) - Third-party research

The Benchmarketing 4-Band Method reads every marketing metric against four percentile bands — P25 (bottom quartile), median, P75 (top quartile), and elite (top ~10%) — for a specific industry and channel, instead of a single cross-industry average. Averages blend brand and non-brand campaigns, $500/month and $500,000/month accounts, and unrelated industries into a number almost nobody actually has.

Benchmarks reflect median values across large sample sets. Your industry, business model, and account maturity will cause variation. Use P25/P75 ranges to understand realistic distribution.

Read full methodology

Written by

Benchmarketing Research Team

Data & Analytics

Reviewed by

Performance Marketing Editorial

Senior Review

Last updated

Reviewed March 2026

Observation period: Q1 2023 – Q4 2024

Related Benchmarks

CTR Benchmarks

Click-through rate data

CPC Benchmarks

Cost per click data

Google Ads Benchmarks

Full platform data

Quality Score Benchmarks

QS by industry