Quality Score Benchmarks 2026

Average Google Ads Quality Score is 6.1/10 cross-industry. Elite accounts average 8+. A QS improvement from 5 to 8 can cut your effective CPC by 20 - 40%. Get started free By Benchmarketing Research Team Reviewed by Performance Marketing Editorial Reviewed March 2026 · observations Q1 2023 – Q4 2024

Google Ads Quality Score - Cross-industry medians-2026

6.1/10

Avg Quality Score, cross-industry median

Elite Threshold
8+/10
Below Average
<4/10
CPC Impact
20 - 40%

Understanding Quality Score Components

Quality Score is Google's 1 - 10 diagnostic rating for each keyword, based on three components. It directly affects your Ad Rank and actual CPC - a higher QS means you pay less per click and win more auctions.

Expected CTR

35%

How likely your ad is to be clicked relative to other ads for the same keyword.

Ad Relevance

35%

How closely your ad copy matches the intent of the search query.

Landing Page Experience

30%

How relevant, transparent, and easy to navigate your landing page is for the user.

CPC Impact by Quality Score

1

+400%

2

+150%

3

+67%

4

+25%

5

0%

6

-17%

7

-28%

8

-37%

9

-44%

10

-50%

CPC adjustment vs. QS 5 baseline. Source: Google Ads internal documentation.

Important: Quality Score is a diagnostic metric, not an optimization target. Do not optimize campaigns just to raise QS numbers. The correct approach is to optimize for conversion outcomes - better ad relevance and landing page experience will naturally raise QS as a byproduct.

Quality Score by Industry

SegmentMedian QSBottom QuartileTop Quartile
Nonprofit 6.8 59
Education 6.5 48
Ecommerce 6.4 48
SaaS 6.3 48
Healthcare 6.1 48
Automotive 6.0 48
Financial Services 5.8 37
Home Services 5.9 37
Legal 5.7 37
Real Estate 5.6 37

Legal and financial services have lower average QS partly due to regulatory constraints on ad copy and landing page content, which limits how tightly keywords, ads, and pages can be aligned.

How to Improve Quality Score

1

Match keyword to ad copy tightly

Each ad group should have a tight semantic theme. The exact keyword (or close variant) should appear in the headline and ideally in the description. Loose ad groups with 50+ keywords per ad produce low ad relevance scores and low expected CTR because the ad copy cannot match all queries.

2

Improve expected CTR via ad testing

Expected CTR is the biggest QS lever. Test 3 - 4 RSA (Responsive Search Ad) headline variations focused on the primary user intent. Headlines that mirror the search query and lead with a benefit outperform generic copy. Use ad strength scores and pinning sparingly.

3

Align landing page to keyword intent

Google evaluates landing page relevance by comparing the page content to the keyword and ad. If someone searches "emergency plumber NYC" and lands on your homepage with generic service categories, landing page experience will be rated "Below Average." Create dedicated landing pages for high-priority keyword themes.

4

Add negative keywords to prevent irrelevant impressions

Irrelevant impressions where your ad is shown but not clicked directly lower your expected CTR score. A robust negative keyword list prevents your ads from appearing for queries where they will not get clicked - protecting your QS from unrelated traffic.

5

Use SKAGs or STAGs for high-value terms

Single Keyword Ad Groups (SKAGs) or Single Theme Ad Groups (STAGs) for your highest-value keywords allow perfect alignment between keyword, ad copy, and landing page. For your 10 - 20 most valuable keywords, dedicated ad groups with tailored ads consistently achieve QS 8 - 10.

Frequently Asked Questions

The cross-industry median Quality Score is 6.1/10. A QS of 7 - 8 is strong and indicates your keywords, ads, and landing pages are well-aligned. QS 9 - 10 is elite and typically achieved only for branded keywords or extremely tight ad groups. QS below 4 is a red flag - your ads are likely rated "Below Average" on multiple components and you are paying a CPC premium of 25%+ above the baseline. Focus first on keywords with high impression volume and low QS - those have the biggest cost savings available.

Sources

Every statistic on this page traces to a named source below. Benchmarketing does not publish anonymous "studies show" figures. Rows labeled Benchmarketing are our own aggregated, curated benchmark data.

  1. 1 WordStream Google Ads Benchmarks, 2024. Third-party research
  2. 2 Meta Business Insights, 2024. Platform data
  3. 3 HubSpot Email Marketing Report, 2024. Third-party research
  4. 4 Unbounce Conversion Benchmark Report, 2024. Third-party research
  5. 5 Databox Marketing Benchmark Report, 2024. Third-party research
  6. 6 AdLiftr Snapchat Ads Cost Benchmarks, 2026. Third-party research
  7. 7 Ad Badger Amazon Advertising Benchmarks, 2026. Third-party research
Cite this page Email me when these benchmarks change

No account needed. At most one email a week, only when something moves.

See how your performance compares

Import a campaign export and see each metric placed against the benchmark for your industry and channel.

Get started free

Invite-only right now · 14-day free trial when you join

Where do you rank?

Enter your Quality Score (Google Ads) to see your percentile position.

/10 4/10 P25 6.1/10 Med 8/10 P75 10/10 Elite

Enter your Quality Score (Google Ads) above

These benchmarks are drawn from a multi-source benchmark cohort aggregated across industries and regions, covering the period Q1 2023 – Q4 2024. Figures on this page come from the Benchmarketing benchmark dataset: thousands of curated benchmark observations spanning channels, industries, and US metro areas, refreshed on a published schedule. Every statistic traces to a named source — no anonymous “studies show.” Data is sourced from:

  • WordStream Google Ads Benchmarks (2024) - Third-party research
  • Meta Business Insights (2024) - Platform data
  • HubSpot Email Marketing Report (2024) - Third-party research
  • Unbounce Conversion Benchmark Report (2024) - Third-party research
  • Databox Marketing Benchmark Report (2024) - Third-party research
  • AdLiftr Snapchat Ads Cost Benchmarks (2026) - Third-party research
  • Ad Badger Amazon Advertising Benchmarks (2026) - Third-party research

The Benchmarketing 4-Band Method reads every marketing metric against four percentile bands — P25 (bottom quartile), median, P75 (top quartile), and elite (top ~10%) — for a specific industry and channel, instead of a single cross-industry average. Averages blend brand and non-brand campaigns, $500/month and $500,000/month accounts, and unrelated industries into a number almost nobody actually has.

Benchmarks reflect median values across large sample sets. Your industry, business model, and account maturity will cause variation. Use P25/P75 ranges to understand realistic distribution.

Read full methodology

Written by

Benchmarketing Research Team

Data & Analytics

Reviewed by

Performance Marketing Editorial

Senior Review

Last updated

Reviewed March 2026

Observation period: Q1 2023 – Q4 2024

Related Benchmarks

CPC Benchmarks

Cost per click data

CTR Benchmarks

Click-through rate data

Google Ads Benchmarks

Full platform data

Impression Share Benchmarks

IS by industry